Recently I was made aware of some online articles regarding an individual that goes by the name of Jarrod Sierocki he works or owns a business called Insolvency Guardian. I see I was not the only person fooled and taken by this individual. I now feel less stupid however this provides no real comfort to his other casualties.
My story is probably much like the rest I / we were introduced to Jarrods' services via a third party who told us Jarrod was nothing short of brilliant and in fairness to both him and Jarrod it appeared that way in the very beginning, but as time went on the brilliance disappeared and a new personality evolved. A personality that loved money and wanted more and more from us and he would not stop till he got a fair chunk out of us.
We also dealt with another person an accountant called Stewart from GUFG, Jarrod referred him on to us but down the track we found out the Stewart left of his own accord but Jarrod told us he sacked him because he stole upwards of $100,000 from the company. More lies we have since found out.
I do not want to get into the nitty gritty to much on all this but i can honestly say that Jarrod Sierocki convinced us to part with $100,000 plus dollars for his services. Our fault we trusted him and the person that referred him. We still trust the person that referred him as we still do business with him and he has always been great and honest to deal with.
I should of realised that Jarrod was full of rubbish earlier on in our dealings, I should of had him checked out when he first made outlandish claims he was a forensic accountant, a barrister and even lectured law at a university. Alarm bells really started going off though when I got a phone call from him one day he claimed we were up for a tax audit and possible DPN. I said what does that mean, he said major problems as we have not finished your books and if you get audited or served with a DPN you will be in the s**t big time. I foolishly asked what do I do, he replied don' worry i maybe able to have this postponed or even go away through a Freemason contact I have in the ATO but it will cost you. I need you to pay ex amount of dollars to the following trust account, but dont let #### know because he may not approve and I dont want him to know. Remember I am doing you a favour with this. Something sounded really suspicious so I called #### and asked him what was going on. He had no idea he took it up with Sierocki and this was the end of their business dealings and ours with Insolvency Guardian.
Look I am not sure how many other people have experienced what we have, but I understand that his character and business dealings are now coming under some serious online fire. I honestly think Sierocki had a good business model if he ran the business with some level of honesty he would of done really well.
I do have some concerns that his charity work or dealings are not as they appear, I believe he may do this just so he can put up on his website that he is a good person helping the homeless and less fortunate. Here is some food for thought pal after you drained us for well over $100,000 we were luck to keep going, we may of ended up homeless, how would you feel about that? Think about that Jarrod.
My name is Paul K, I find it most disturbing that Jarrod Sierocki continues his personal and business attacks on me. Sure I was a partner of Jarrod Sierocki, sure I decided to pull out of Insolvency Guardian and sure I had issues with Jarrod and the ongoing daily dramas that surrounded having a business relationship with this guy and the way he acted in my opinion on a daily basis. Don't get me wrong there were some times that Jarrod acted perfect and other days totally crazy almost a Jeckyl and Hyde personality.
The defamatory claims Jarrod has posted up online about me and SK and Associates are not only slanderous and untrue but almost somewhat humorous.
Jarrod wrote online at JarrodSierocki.com.au
We believe the reason for this behavior is to defame my good name and that of Insolvency Guardian and its community work. "What good name Jarrod have you spoken with your client base and ask them how they felt after dealing with Insolvency Guardian?"
You wrote: We also believe that this competitor is using emails that we believe have been illegally hacked/obtained from our Servers by him or them for the sole purpose of discrediting the company Insolvency Guardian and myself. "Jarrod this is another huge defamatory claim that you have made, if you believed you have been illegally hacked then report this to the police, you know this is more made up waffle just to try and cover you backside yet again, the information coming out about you is being posted by your Insolvency Guardian clients, not me. Any information I may have in my possession is being supplied to me for review not for opinion or consultation."
What you are publishing is more lies Jarrod to cover yourself.
Lets publish the real facts and the truth so we can clear the air once and for all, after Jarrod and I parted company we both agreed we would not do anything to hinder or cause harm, hindrance or malice towards each other. It was also stated in a legal binding agreement. I have attached a copy of this agreement clause.
As you will witness from what you read ahead Jarrod delivered the first low blow punch towards me was when he reported my new site to Google for black listing. See for yourself the facts don't lie.
2B. Acknowledgement by Sierocki
Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related entities expressly acknowledge that no restraint of trade applies to Klerck, his associates and related entities under this Deed. This means that Klerck and his associates and related entities may act in direct competition to Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related companies and any further business activities which may be perceived to be or is in direct competition to Insolvency Guardian.
So what is the first attack against me and Insolvency Professionals.
This http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=623075
Notice Unavailable DMCA (Copyright) Complaint to Google
Sent by: Insolvency Guardian Pty Ltd
To: GoogleThe cease-and-desist or legal threat you requested is not yet available.Chilling Effects will post the notice after we process it.Question: Why does a web host, blogging service provider, or search engine get DMCA takedown notices?Answer: Many copyright claimants are making complaints under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Section 512(c)' safe-harbor for hosts of "Information Residing on Systems or Networks At Direction of Users" or Section 512(d)'s safe-harbor for providers of "Information Location Tools." These safe harbors give providers immunity from liability for users' possible copyright infringement -- if they "expeditiously" remove material when they get complaints. Whether or not the provider would have been liable for infringement by users' materials it hosts or links to, the provider can avoid the possibility of a
lawsuit for money damages by following the DMCA's takedown procedure when it gets a complaint. The person whose information was removed can file a counter-notification if he or she believes the complaint was
erroneous.
So straight away Insolvency Guardian gets this activated and damages any chances of me attempting to make Insolvency Professionals a success.
In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 8 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint that caused the removal(s) at ChillingEffects.org.
I wont go into all the additional, childish behavior that I have had to endure.
But as all the Insolvency Guardian unhappy customers begin to speak out Jarrod straight away goes on the attack against me, by filling a Supreme Court Action for defamation. Here is the reality Jarrod, it is only defamation if:
Defamation is a tort, or a civil wrong, which occurs when defamatory material relating to an individual is published.
Material will be defamatory if it could: injure the reputation of the individual by exposing them to hatred, contempt or ridicule; cause people to shun or avoid the individual; or lower the individuals estimation by right thinking members of society.
For a defamation action to be successful, three elements must be satisfied: the information was communicated by the defendant to a third person other than the plaintiff (publication); the material identifies the plaintiff (identification); and the information/material contains matter that is defamatory, regardless of whether the material was intentionally published or not (defamatory matter). Provided that no defences are applicable, if the elements are satisfied then the defendant will be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff to compensate him or her for the damage caused to his or her reputation.
Both are actionable, and I can assure you if you don't file a notice of discontinuance, post public apologies to me and my companies, agree to a cease and desist order I will use that Amex Black of mine and slam you with the best legal representation money can buy. I will not be relying on a Bartercard funded legal representation. I know I will never get anything out of you, because you have to have something in the first place. I will get a surety for costs against you and Insolvency Guardian because your claim is false and unproven.
But at the end of the day I will prove my credibility over yours this will be determined by the 18 signed affidavits I now hold in my possession with more coming one of these comes from a gentleman called Praveen Raghuhbar he has provided me with so many emails from you as well as recordings of threatening phone calls where you racially abused both Praveen and Scott Briggs in an attempt to extort more money from them. Maybe a Podcast would be appropriate in this case. The interesting factor with all these affidavits is they all make reference and claims of you being a Barrister and or Forensic Accountant. I have also managed to track down proof that you stood up at a Bartercard breakfast and advised all attendees that you were in fact a Barrister. Will Jamieson has also sworn out an affidavit that you advised him in front of a Justice of the Peace at Vincents chartered accountants in Brisbane that you are a Barrister. The same as you told Scott Donald, Nick Ray, Mick James, Michael and Kerri-Anne Benton, Brent Thompson, Kurt Frazer, Drew Hankin, Tony Atkins a police officer from Kingscliff and the list goes on and on.
Jarrod Sierocki Insolvency Guardian Scam Victims Current List of Victims Known to Date
The following is a list of known victims of Insolvency Guardian all these people have recorded proof of been ripped off and extorted by Jarrod Sierocki.
Brent Thompson approx $18,000
Kurt Frazer victim $15,000 Ten Thousand in cash and then took his tax return refund as well.
Michael and Kerri Anne Benton $120,000 Ripped off told that if they did not keep paying they would be up for a DPN and possible ATO audits. Total extortion.
Wayne Smith upwards of $200,000 Full on extortion by Sierocki.
Carl and Elizabeth Leigh $20,000 Jarrod transferred assets in to his name a Jet Ski and Timeshare into his wives name Vedrana Sierocki. These assets should of become the property of the Trustee. Jarrod put in writing to a reputable bankruptcy firm that he had paid $17,000 to Peter Dinoris of Vincents. Further investigation have realised that Jarrod Sierocki had not paid Vincents $17,000 it was a complete lie. Carl and Elizabeth Leigh are co-operating with ITSA to have Jarrod charged for fraud.
Joe Augello $14,000 Joe was threatened with a long series of extortion style emails from Sierocki and abusive threatening phone calls from Sierocki.
Simon Grezlo Approx $50,000 Details withheld until statements completed
Iboyla Grezlo Approx $50,000 Details withheld until statements completed
Jarred Hill $30,000 Two + years down the track and $30,000 in money paid out. Jarred Hill is now in a worse off position than when he first went to Sierocki.
Christine Wake Approx $!5,000 Fish and Chip shop owner that was harassed and abused by Sierocki.
John Michael James $60,000 for a Section 73 and a credit file clean, Section 73 completed but credit file not touched.
David Bonifant Professionals Real Estate Illegally reposed his car whilst holding a meeting with him Insolvency Guardian.
Rick Halstead Clipstar Jarrod illegally published defamatory comments and statements about Clipstar and ASAP online through his Australian Online News website and in Newspapers.
Danny McGee TCG, Jarrod drew weekly wages from Danny and failed to do his job, he also engineered false and misleading evidence to ADCO in detailed report about Danny and his company so that Danny would loose potential business contracts with ADCO. Danny claims this has created massive damage to him and his businesses reputation. He intends to seek a defamation claim against Seirocki in the coming weeks.
We will keep you updated with the latest Sierocki scam files as it comes to hand we are currently conducting investigations into another 13 victims that have been affected not only by Jarrod Sierocki but also his partner in crime Bernard Neville.
Jarrod Sierocki does not have hundreds of partners and he does not have offices throughout Australia, UK, Europe and New Zealand. He sets up Servcorp service office offices and fakes it all. He is not a SIR either he belongs to an organisation of robe wearing wooden sword swinging knob jockeys known as the Knights Templars, and because of this he gives himself a title of SIR Jarrod Sierocki. It should be SIR Jarrod Knob Jockey.
Be warned this guy is not a Forensic Accountant or a Barrister or has a Doctorate in Law and is not a Bond University Law Lecturer. Bond Uni have confirmed he has never lectured and never will be lecturing law for or at Bond Uni. New evidence has come to hand that Jarrod attended a Bartercard networking breakfast and stood up and made the claim that he was a Barrister. We are now gathering signed statements supporting this and will publish these as they come to hand. Jarrod Sierocki makes Peter Foster look like a choir boy when it comes to scams.
My name is Paul K, I find it most disturbing that Jarrod Sierocki continues his personal and business attacks on me. Sure I was a partner of Jarrod Sierocki, sure I decided to pull out of Insolvency Guardian and sure I had issues with Jarrod and the ongoing daily dramas that surrounded having a business relationship with this guy and the way he acted in my opinion on a daily basis. Don't get me wrong there were some times that Jarrod acted perfect and other days totally crazy almost a Jeckyl and Hyde personality.
The defamatory claims Jarrod has posted up online about me and SK and Associates are not only slanderous and untrue but almost somewhat humorous.
Jarrod wrote online at JarrodSierocki.com.au
We believe the reason for this behavior is to defame my good name and that of Insolvency Guardian and its community work. "What good name Jarrod have you spoken with your client base and ask them how they felt after dealing with Insolvency Guardian?"
You wrote: We also believe that this competitor is using emails that we believe have been illegally hacked/obtained from our Servers by him or them for the sole purpose of discrediting the company Insolvency Guardian and myself. "Jarrod this is another huge defamatory claim that you have made, if you believed you have been illegally hacked then report this to the police, you know this is more made up waffle just to try and cover you backside yet again, the information coming out about you is being posted by your Insolvency Guardian clients, not me. Any information I may have in my possession is being supplied to me for review not for opinion or consultation."
What you are publishing is more lies Jarrod to cover yourself.
Lets publish the real facts and the truth so we can clear the air once and for all, after Jarrod and I parted company we both agreed we would not do anything to hinder or cause harm, hindrance or malice towards each other. It was also stated in a legal binding agreement. I have attached a copy of this agreement clause.
As you will witness from what you read ahead Jarrod delivered the first low blow punch towards me was when he reported my new site to Google for black listing. See for yourself the facts don't lie.
2B. Acknowledgement by Sierocki
Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related entities expressly acknowledge that no restraint of trade applies to Klerck, his associates and related entities under this Deed. This means that Klerck and his associates and related entities may act in direct competition to Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related companies and any further business activities which may be perceived to be or is in direct competition to Insolvency Guardian.
So what is the first attack against me and Insolvency Professionals.
This http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=623075
Notice Unavailable DMCA (Copyright) Complaint to Google
Sent by: Insolvency Guardian Pty Ltd
To: GoogleThe cease-and-desist or legal threat you requested is not yet available.Chilling Effects will post the notice after we process it.Question: Why does a web host, blogging service provider, or search engine get DMCA takedown notices?Answer: Many copyright claimants are making complaints under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Section 512(c)' safe-harbor for hosts of "Information Residing on Systems or Networks At Direction of Users" or Section 512(d)'s safe-harbor for providers of "Information Location Tools." These safe harbors give providers immunity from liability for users' possible copyright infringement -- if they "expeditiously" remove material when they get complaints. Whether or not the provider would have been liable for infringement by users' materials it hosts or links to, the provider can avoid the possibility of a
lawsuit for money damages by following the DMCA's takedown procedure when it gets a complaint. The person whose information was removed can file a counter-notification if he or she believes the complaint was
erroneous.
So straight away Insolvency Guardian gets this activated and damages any chances of me attempting to make Insolvency Professionals a success.
In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 8 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint that caused the removal(s) at ChillingEffects.org.
I wont go into all the additional, childish behavior that I have had to endure.
But as all the Insolvency Guardian unhappy customers begin to speak out Jarrod straight away goes on the attack against me, by filling a Supreme Court Action for defamation. Here is the reality Jarrod, it is only defamation if:
Defamation is a tort, or a civil wrong, which occurs when defamatory material relating to an individual is published.
Material will be defamatory if it could: injure the reputation of the individual by exposing them to hatred, contempt or ridicule; cause people to shun or avoid the individual; or lower the individuals estimation by right thinking members of society.
For a defamation action to be successful, three elements must be satisfied: the information was communicated by the defendant to a third person other than the plaintiff (publication); the material identifies the plaintiff (identification); and the information/material contains matter that is defamatory, regardless of whether the material was intentionally published or not (defamatory matter). Provided that no defences are applicable, if the elements are satisfied then the defendant will be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff to compensate him or her for the damage caused to his or her reputation.
Both are actionable, and I can assure you if you don't file a notice of discontinuance, post public apologies to me and my companies, agree to a cease and desist order I will use that Amex Black of mine and slam you with the best legal representation money can buy. I will not be relying on a Bartercard funded legal representation. I know I will never get anything out of you, because you have to have something in the first place. I will get a surety for costs against you and Insolvency Guardian because your claim is false and unproven.
But at the end of the day I will prove my credibility over yours this will be determined by the 18 signed affidavits I now hold in my possession with more coming one of these comes from a gentleman called Praveen Raghuhbar he has provided me with so many emails from you as well as recordings of threatening phone calls where you racially abused both Praveen and Scott Briggs in an attempt to extort more money from them. Maybe a Podcast would be appropriate in this case. The interesting factor with all these affidavits is they all make reference and claims of you being a Barrister and or Forensic Accountant. I have also managed to track down proof that you stood up at a Bartercard breakfast and advised all attendees that you were in fact a Barrister. Will Jamieson has also sworn out an affidavit that you advised him in front of a Justice of the Peace at Vincents chartered accountants in Brisbane that you are a Barrister. The same as you told Scott Donald, Nick Ray, Mick James, Michael and Kerri-Anne Benton, Brent Thompson, Kurt Frazer, Drew Hankin, Tony Atkins a police officer from Kingscliff and the list goes on and on.
Insolvency Guardian PTY LTD Reviews
Recently I was made aware of some online articles regarding an individual that goes by the name of Jarrod Sierocki he works or owns a business called Insolvency Guardian. I see I was not the only person fooled and taken by this individual. I now feel less stupid however this provides no real comfort to his other casualties.
My story is probably much like the rest I / we were introduced to Jarrods' services via a third party who told us Jarrod was nothing short of brilliant and in fairness to both him and Jarrod it appeared that way in the very beginning, but as time went on the brilliance disappeared and a new personality evolved. A personality that loved money and wanted more and more from us and he would not stop till he got a fair chunk out of us.
We also dealt with another person an accountant called Stewart from GUFG, Jarrod referred him on to us but down the track we found out the Stewart left of his own accord but Jarrod told us he sacked him because he stole upwards of $100,000 from the company. More lies we have since found out.
I do not want to get into the nitty gritty to much on all this but i can honestly say that Jarrod Sierocki convinced us to part with $100,000 plus dollars for his services. Our fault we trusted him and the person that referred him. We still trust the person that referred him as we still do business with him and he has always been great and honest to deal with.
I should of realised that Jarrod was full of rubbish earlier on in our dealings, I should of had him checked out when he first made outlandish claims he was a forensic accountant, a barrister and even lectured law at a university. Alarm bells really started going off though when I got a phone call from him one day he claimed we were up for a tax audit and possible DPN. I said what does that mean, he said major problems as we have not finished your books and if you get audited or served with a DPN you will be in the s**t big time. I foolishly asked what do I do, he replied don' worry i maybe able to have this postponed or even go away through a Freemason contact I have in the ATO but it will cost you. I need you to pay ex amount of dollars to the following trust account, but dont let #### know because he may not approve and I dont want him to know. Remember I am doing you a favour with this. Something sounded really suspicious so I called #### and asked him what was going on. He had no idea he took it up with Sierocki and this was the end of their business dealings and ours with Insolvency Guardian.
Look I am not sure how many other people have experienced what we have, but I understand that his character and business dealings are now coming under some serious online fire. I honestly think Sierocki had a good business model if he ran the business with some level of honesty he would of done really well.
I do have some concerns that his charity work or dealings are not as they appear, I believe he may do this just so he can put up on his website that he is a good person helping the homeless and less fortunate. Here is some food for thought pal after you drained us for well over $100,000 we were luck to keep going, we may of ended up homeless, how would you feel about that? Think about that Jarrod.
My name is Paul K, I find it most disturbing that Jarrod Sierocki continues his personal and business attacks on me. Sure I was a partner of Jarrod Sierocki, sure I decided to pull out of Insolvency Guardian and sure I had issues with Jarrod and the ongoing daily dramas that surrounded having a business relationship with this guy and the way he acted in my opinion on a daily basis. Don't get me wrong there were some times that Jarrod acted perfect and other days totally crazy almost a Jeckyl and Hyde personality.
The defamatory claims Jarrod has posted up online about me and SK and Associates are not only slanderous and untrue but almost somewhat humorous.
Jarrod wrote online at JarrodSierocki.com.au
We believe the reason for this behavior is to defame my good name and that of Insolvency Guardian and its community work. "What good name Jarrod have you spoken with your client base and ask them how they felt after dealing with Insolvency Guardian?"
You wrote: We also believe that this competitor is using emails that we believe have been illegally hacked/obtained from our Servers by him or them for the sole purpose of discrediting the company Insolvency Guardian and myself. "Jarrod this is another huge defamatory claim that you have made, if you believed you have been illegally hacked then report this to the police, you know this is more made up waffle just to try and cover you backside yet again, the information coming out about you is being posted by your Insolvency Guardian clients, not me. Any information I may have in my possession is being supplied to me for review not for opinion or consultation."
What you are publishing is more lies Jarrod to cover yourself.
Lets publish the real facts and the truth so we can clear the air once and for all, after Jarrod and I parted company we both agreed we would not do anything to hinder or cause harm, hindrance or malice towards each other. It was also stated in a legal binding agreement. I have attached a copy of this agreement clause.
As you will witness from what you read ahead Jarrod delivered the first low blow punch towards me was when he reported my new site to Google for black listing. See for yourself the facts don't lie.
2B. Acknowledgement by Sierocki
Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related entities expressly acknowledge that no restraint of trade applies to Klerck, his associates and related entities under this Deed. This means that Klerck and his associates and related entities may act in direct competition to Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related companies and any further business activities which may be perceived to be or is in direct competition to Insolvency Guardian.
So what is the first attack against me and Insolvency Professionals.
This http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=623075
Notice Unavailable DMCA (Copyright) Complaint to Google
Sent by: Insolvency Guardian Pty Ltd
To: GoogleThe cease-and-desist or legal threat you requested is not yet available.Chilling Effects will post the notice after we process it.Question: Why does a web host, blogging service provider, or search engine get DMCA takedown notices?Answer: Many copyright claimants are making complaints under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Section 512(c)' safe-harbor for hosts of "Information Residing on Systems or Networks At Direction of Users" or Section 512(d)'s safe-harbor for providers of "Information Location Tools." These safe harbors give providers immunity from liability for users' possible copyright infringement -- if they "expeditiously" remove material when they get complaints. Whether or not the provider would have been liable for infringement by users' materials it hosts or links to, the provider can avoid the possibility of a
lawsuit for money damages by following the DMCA's takedown procedure when it gets a complaint. The person whose information was removed can file a counter-notification if he or she believes the complaint was
erroneous.
So straight away Insolvency Guardian gets this activated and damages any chances of me attempting to make Insolvency Professionals a success.
In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 8 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint that caused the removal(s) at ChillingEffects.org.
I wont go into all the additional, childish behavior that I have had to endure.
But as all the Insolvency Guardian unhappy customers begin to speak out Jarrod straight away goes on the attack against me, by filling a Supreme Court Action for defamation. Here is the reality Jarrod, it is only defamation if:
Defamation is a tort, or a civil wrong, which occurs when defamatory material relating to an individual is published.
Material will be defamatory if it could: injure the reputation of the individual by exposing them to hatred, contempt or ridicule; cause people to shun or avoid the individual; or lower the individuals estimation by right thinking members of society.
For a defamation action to be successful, three elements must be satisfied: the information was communicated by the defendant to a third person other than the plaintiff (publication); the material identifies the plaintiff (identification); and the information/material contains matter that is defamatory, regardless of whether the material was intentionally published or not (defamatory matter). Provided that no defences are applicable, if the elements are satisfied then the defendant will be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff to compensate him or her for the damage caused to his or her reputation.
Both are actionable, and I can assure you if you don't file a notice of discontinuance, post public apologies to me and my companies, agree to a cease and desist order I will use that Amex Black of mine and slam you with the best legal representation money can buy. I will not be relying on a Bartercard funded legal representation. I know I will never get anything out of you, because you have to have something in the first place. I will get a surety for costs against you and Insolvency Guardian because your claim is false and unproven.
But at the end of the day I will prove my credibility over yours this will be determined by the 18 signed affidavits I now hold in my possession with more coming one of these comes from a gentleman called Praveen Raghuhbar he has provided me with so many emails from you as well as recordings of threatening phone calls where you racially abused both Praveen and Scott Briggs in an attempt to extort more money from them. Maybe a Podcast would be appropriate in this case. The interesting factor with all these affidavits is they all make reference and claims of you being a Barrister and or Forensic Accountant. I have also managed to track down proof that you stood up at a Bartercard breakfast and advised all attendees that you were in fact a Barrister. Will Jamieson has also sworn out an affidavit that you advised him in front of a Justice of the Peace at Vincents chartered accountants in Brisbane that you are a Barrister. The same as you told Scott Donald, Nick Ray, Mick James, Michael and Kerri-Anne Benton, Brent Thompson, Kurt Frazer, Drew Hankin, Tony Atkins a police officer from Kingscliff and the list goes on and on.
Jarrod Sierocki Insolvency Guardian Scam Victims Current List of Victims Known to Date
The following is a list of known victims of Insolvency Guardian all these people have recorded proof of been ripped off and extorted by Jarrod Sierocki.
Brent Thompson approx $18,000
Kurt Frazer victim $15,000 Ten Thousand in cash and then took his tax return refund as well.
Michael and Kerri Anne Benton $120,000 Ripped off told that if they did not keep paying they would be up for a DPN and possible ATO audits. Total extortion.
Wayne Smith upwards of $200,000 Full on extortion by Sierocki.
Carl and Elizabeth Leigh $20,000 Jarrod transferred assets in to his name a Jet Ski and Timeshare into his wives name Vedrana Sierocki. These assets should of become the property of the Trustee. Jarrod put in writing to a reputable bankruptcy firm that he had paid $17,000 to Peter Dinoris of Vincents. Further investigation have realised that Jarrod Sierocki had not paid Vincents $17,000 it was a complete lie. Carl and Elizabeth Leigh are co-operating with ITSA to have Jarrod charged for fraud.
Joe Augello $14,000 Joe was threatened with a long series of extortion style emails from Sierocki and abusive threatening phone calls from Sierocki.
Simon Grezlo Approx $50,000 Details withheld until statements completed
Iboyla Grezlo Approx $50,000 Details withheld until statements completed
Jarred Hill $30,000 Two + years down the track and $30,000 in money paid out. Jarred Hill is now in a worse off position than when he first went to Sierocki.
Christine Wake Approx $!5,000 Fish and Chip shop owner that was harassed and abused by Sierocki.
John Michael James $60,000 for a Section 73 and a credit file clean, Section 73 completed but credit file not touched.
David Bonifant Professionals Real Estate Illegally reposed his car whilst holding a meeting with him Insolvency Guardian.
Rick Halstead Clipstar Jarrod illegally published defamatory comments and statements about Clipstar and ASAP online through his Australian Online News website and in Newspapers.
Danny McGee TCG, Jarrod drew weekly wages from Danny and failed to do his job, he also engineered false and misleading evidence to ADCO in detailed report about Danny and his company so that Danny would loose potential business contracts with ADCO. Danny claims this has created massive damage to him and his businesses reputation. He intends to seek a defamation claim against Seirocki in the coming weeks.
We will keep you updated with the latest Sierocki scam files as it comes to hand we are currently conducting investigations into another 13 victims that have been affected not only by Jarrod Sierocki but also his partner in crime Bernard Neville.
Jarrod Sierocki does not have hundreds of partners and he does not have offices throughout Australia, UK, Europe and New Zealand. He sets up Servcorp service office offices and fakes it all. He is not a SIR either he belongs to an organisation of robe wearing wooden sword swinging knob jockeys known as the Knights Templars, and because of this he gives himself a title of SIR Jarrod Sierocki. It should be SIR Jarrod Knob Jockey.
Be warned this guy is not a Forensic Accountant or a Barrister or has a Doctorate in Law and is not a Bond University Law Lecturer. Bond Uni have confirmed he has never lectured and never will be lecturing law for or at Bond Uni. New evidence has come to hand that Jarrod attended a Bartercard networking breakfast and stood up and made the claim that he was a Barrister. We are now gathering signed statements supporting this and will publish these as they come to hand. Jarrod Sierocki makes Peter Foster look like a choir boy when it comes to scams.
My name is Paul K, I find it most disturbing that Jarrod Sierocki continues his personal and business attacks on me. Sure I was a partner of Jarrod Sierocki, sure I decided to pull out of Insolvency Guardian and sure I had issues with Jarrod and the ongoing daily dramas that surrounded having a business relationship with this guy and the way he acted in my opinion on a daily basis. Don't get me wrong there were some times that Jarrod acted perfect and other days totally crazy almost a Jeckyl and Hyde personality.
The defamatory claims Jarrod has posted up online about me and SK and Associates are not only slanderous and untrue but almost somewhat humorous.
Jarrod wrote online at JarrodSierocki.com.au
We believe the reason for this behavior is to defame my good name and that of Insolvency Guardian and its community work. "What good name Jarrod have you spoken with your client base and ask them how they felt after dealing with Insolvency Guardian?"
You wrote: We also believe that this competitor is using emails that we believe have been illegally hacked/obtained from our Servers by him or them for the sole purpose of discrediting the company Insolvency Guardian and myself. "Jarrod this is another huge defamatory claim that you have made, if you believed you have been illegally hacked then report this to the police, you know this is more made up waffle just to try and cover you backside yet again, the information coming out about you is being posted by your Insolvency Guardian clients, not me. Any information I may have in my possession is being supplied to me for review not for opinion or consultation."
What you are publishing is more lies Jarrod to cover yourself.
Lets publish the real facts and the truth so we can clear the air once and for all, after Jarrod and I parted company we both agreed we would not do anything to hinder or cause harm, hindrance or malice towards each other. It was also stated in a legal binding agreement. I have attached a copy of this agreement clause.
As you will witness from what you read ahead Jarrod delivered the first low blow punch towards me was when he reported my new site to Google for black listing. See for yourself the facts don't lie.
2B. Acknowledgement by Sierocki
Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related entities expressly acknowledge that no restraint of trade applies to Klerck, his associates and related entities under this Deed. This means that Klerck and his associates and related entities may act in direct competition to Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related companies and any further business activities which may be perceived to be or is in direct competition to Insolvency Guardian.
So what is the first attack against me and Insolvency Professionals.
This http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=623075
Notice Unavailable DMCA (Copyright) Complaint to Google
Sent by: Insolvency Guardian Pty Ltd
To: GoogleThe cease-and-desist or legal threat you requested is not yet available.Chilling Effects will post the notice after we process it.Question: Why does a web host, blogging service provider, or search engine get DMCA takedown notices?Answer: Many copyright claimants are making complaints under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Section 512(c)' safe-harbor for hosts of "Information Residing on Systems or Networks At Direction of Users" or Section 512(d)'s safe-harbor for providers of "Information Location Tools." These safe harbors give providers immunity from liability for users' possible copyright infringement -- if they "expeditiously" remove material when they get complaints. Whether or not the provider would have been liable for infringement by users' materials it hosts or links to, the provider can avoid the possibility of a
lawsuit for money damages by following the DMCA's takedown procedure when it gets a complaint. The person whose information was removed can file a counter-notification if he or she believes the complaint was
erroneous.
So straight away Insolvency Guardian gets this activated and damages any chances of me attempting to make Insolvency Professionals a success.
In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 8 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint that caused the removal(s) at ChillingEffects.org.
I wont go into all the additional, childish behavior that I have had to endure.
But as all the Insolvency Guardian unhappy customers begin to speak out Jarrod straight away goes on the attack against me, by filling a Supreme Court Action for defamation. Here is the reality Jarrod, it is only defamation if:
Defamation is a tort, or a civil wrong, which occurs when defamatory material relating to an individual is published.
Material will be defamatory if it could: injure the reputation of the individual by exposing them to hatred, contempt or ridicule; cause people to shun or avoid the individual; or lower the individuals estimation by right thinking members of society.
For a defamation action to be successful, three elements must be satisfied: the information was communicated by the defendant to a third person other than the plaintiff (publication); the material identifies the plaintiff (identification); and the information/material contains matter that is defamatory, regardless of whether the material was intentionally published or not (defamatory matter). Provided that no defences are applicable, if the elements are satisfied then the defendant will be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff to compensate him or her for the damage caused to his or her reputation.
Both are actionable, and I can assure you if you don't file a notice of discontinuance, post public apologies to me and my companies, agree to a cease and desist order I will use that Amex Black of mine and slam you with the best legal representation money can buy. I will not be relying on a Bartercard funded legal representation. I know I will never get anything out of you, because you have to have something in the first place. I will get a surety for costs against you and Insolvency Guardian because your claim is false and unproven.
But at the end of the day I will prove my credibility over yours this will be determined by the 18 signed affidavits I now hold in my possession with more coming one of these comes from a gentleman called Praveen Raghuhbar he has provided me with so many emails from you as well as recordings of threatening phone calls where you racially abused both Praveen and Scott Briggs in an attempt to extort more money from them. Maybe a Podcast would be appropriate in this case. The interesting factor with all these affidavits is they all make reference and claims of you being a Barrister and or Forensic Accountant. I have also managed to track down proof that you stood up at a Bartercard breakfast and advised all attendees that you were in fact a Barrister. Will Jamieson has also sworn out an affidavit that you advised him in front of a Justice of the Peace at Vincents chartered accountants in Brisbane that you are a Barrister. The same as you told Scott Donald, Nick Ray, Mick James, Michael and Kerri-Anne Benton, Brent Thompson, Kurt Frazer, Drew Hankin, Tony Atkins a police officer from Kingscliff and the list goes on and on.