If you look over online content of Giordanna Toccadeli you will not see someone promoting equality in healthy mature relationships.
Concerning points:
1: It's always the woman's fault.
If a man behaves badly, if he uses a woman, if he treats her with disrespect, or even if he ghosts her... then she was too needy, she was too mothering, she emasculated him, she was behaving in a 'low value' way, or she wasn't embodying her femininity enough.
She killed his desire. It is, essentially, her fault.
She should have been able to keep his interest, create continual attraction to her, and keep him in her circle of men she is dating.
The only way to solve this, in Giodanna's world, is to increase her 'feminitity' or conduct herself in a more 'high value' way.
(There is a disproportionate amount of blame placed on the woman with little to no responsibility placed on her male partner.)
2: Women are subservient to men.
Giodanna states that when her partner comes home, she greets him at the door with a kiss, she then leaves him alone until he comes to her, when he comes to her -- he may want sex or food. She then gives him what he wants.
He takes care of the dinner reservations, travel plans and paying of bills. She is responsible for the house being clean, the meals being ready at home... etc.
There is nothing wrong with traditional roles and norms if that is what authentically appeals to someone but, the idea that a household should function around a man's needs (in an almost 1960s style way of thinking) is very concerning.
It is implied that if a woman does not conduct herself in this way -- the man won't feel valued or respected -- and will loose interest in her.
He will cheat or leave. (Once again, his behavior is her fault.)
While women are allowed to created consequences for her partner, any healthy boundary setting is seen as creating an ultimatum which will push a man a way. (Women have very limited options in their responces to men under these methods.)
3: She attempts to diagnose mental health issues -- with no background in mental health.
This may be the most concerning. A quick search on Facebook shows she loosely throws around psychological gargon with no more than a pop-culture type of understanding of the words she is using.
She conveys that she can help people that is is not qualified to help.
She is quick to call someone a naracist or co-dependent, especially people who opperate under a different worldview than her own.
4: If you don't hire her, you are screwed.
She conveys that a woman will be without love, alone forever, or in a mediocure relationship if she doesn't pay Giordanna.
She is manipulative in her marketing; She is conniving and cold-hearted as she attempts to call people out who disagree with her (under the guise of educating others); She is dangerous to the self-esteem and well being of women.
A good friend who is very involved in the personal development space (she is a coach herself) shared this with a group of mental health professionals that I am a part of:
It is commonly understood in the online coaching space that many women who work with 'Gio' end up seeking other relationship coaches. They leave feeling damaged, abandoned, and confused when it comes to romantic relationships.
They feel they are not good enough, can't be themselves, and are often trying to figure out how to be more feminine.
My friend has the impression that lot of these women are afraid to share their experience when it comes to Gio and her 'institute'.
On one hand... Giordanna seemed to explain concepts when it comes to the dynamics between men and women and regarding love relationship that many people relate to. While may have somewhat of a knack for identfying patterns in romantic relationships...
What I'm hearing over and over, unfortunately, is that she does much more harm than good.
Giodana Toccacedli Reviews
If you look over online content of Giordanna Toccadeli you will not see someone promoting equality in healthy mature relationships.
Concerning points:
1: It's always the woman's fault.
If a man behaves badly, if he uses a woman, if he treats her with disrespect, or even if he ghosts her... then she was too needy, she was too mothering, she emasculated him, she was behaving in a 'low value' way, or she wasn't embodying her femininity enough.
She killed his desire. It is, essentially, her fault.
She should have been able to keep his interest, create continual attraction to her, and keep him in her circle of men she is dating.
The only way to solve this, in Giodanna's world, is to increase her 'feminitity' or conduct herself in a more 'high value' way.
(There is a disproportionate amount of blame placed on the woman with little to no responsibility placed on her male partner.)
2: Women are subservient to men.
Giodanna states that when her partner comes home, she greets him at the door with a kiss, she then leaves him alone until he comes to her, when he comes to her -- he may want sex or food. She then gives him what he wants.
He takes care of the dinner reservations, travel plans and paying of bills. She is responsible for the house being clean, the meals being ready at home... etc.
There is nothing wrong with traditional roles and norms if that is what authentically appeals to someone but, the idea that a household should function around a man's needs (in an almost 1960s style way of thinking) is very concerning.
It is implied that if a woman does not conduct herself in this way -- the man won't feel valued or respected -- and will loose interest in her.
He will cheat or leave. (Once again, his behavior is her fault.)
While women are allowed to created consequences for her partner, any healthy boundary setting is seen as creating an ultimatum which will push a man a way. (Women have very limited options in their responces to men under these methods.)
3: She attempts to diagnose mental health issues -- with no background in mental health.
This may be the most concerning. A quick search on Facebook shows she loosely throws around psychological gargon with no more than a pop-culture type of understanding of the words she is using.
She conveys that she can help people that is is not qualified to help.
She is quick to call someone a naracist or co-dependent, especially people who opperate under a different worldview than her own.
4: If you don't hire her, you are screwed.
She conveys that a woman will be without love, alone forever, or in a mediocure relationship if she doesn't pay Giordanna.
She is manipulative in her marketing; She is conniving and cold-hearted as she attempts to call people out who disagree with her (under the guise of educating others); She is dangerous to the self-esteem and well being of women.
A good friend who is very involved in the personal development space (she is a coach herself) shared this with a group of mental health professionals that I am a part of:
It is commonly understood in the online coaching space that many women who work with 'Gio' end up seeking other relationship coaches. They leave feeling damaged, abandoned, and confused when it comes to romantic relationships.
They feel they are not good enough, can't be themselves, and are often trying to figure out how to be more feminine.
My friend has the impression that lot of these women are afraid to share their experience when it comes to Gio and her 'institute'.
On one hand... Giordanna seemed to explain concepts when it comes to the dynamics between men and women and regarding love relationship that many people relate to. While may have somewhat of a knack for identfying patterns in romantic relationships...
What I'm hearing over and over, unfortunately, is that she does much more harm than good.