The Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted establishes that each challenged Statement is true or that it is false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular statement because an opinion cannot be determined.
The Arbitrator was further asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted establishes whether the Author, was in fact, defrauded. The Complainant denies the accusation of such, and states that the Author was not defrauded.
The Arbitrator was further asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted to establish the identity of the Author , shown as “allen.” Complainant essentially believes the Author’s name is merely the middle name of the individual who posted .” The Arbitrator found it more likely than not, given all of the evidence in this case
Epic Stock Picks Reviews
The Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted establishes that each challenged Statement is true or that it is false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular statement because an opinion cannot be determined.
The Arbitrator was further asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted establishes whether the Author, was in fact, defrauded. The Complainant denies the accusation of such, and states that the Author was not defrauded.
The Arbitrator was further asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted to establish the identity of the Author , shown as “allen.” Complainant essentially believes the Author’s name is merely the middle name of the individual who posted .” The Arbitrator found it more likely than not, given all of the evidence in this case