Your voice has a chance to be heard now! scamion.com - we bring changes together.

report scam

Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District


Country United States
State California
City Sacramento
Address U.S. Bank Tower, 621 Capitol Mall #10
Phone 916-654-0209
Website http://www.courts.ca.gov/3dca.htm

Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District Reviews

  • Nov 26, 2018

After the California Supreme Court issued an order to show cause ( In re Jacinto Valdovinos Ca. Supreme #S221202) and returned the inmates case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing in a pending writ of habeas corpus, the trial court judge Bradley L. Boeckman denied the inmates ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the ground that the inmates former attorney, Max Ruffcorn, was a credible witness. Max Ruffcorn and the inmate, Jacinto Jose Valdovinos, testified at the evidentiary hearing. The petitioner, Valdovinos, testified that his former attorney, Ruffcorn, advised him to reject a plea bargain of 16 years based upon and error of law and a false assumption that the only witness in the case would not be allowed to testify. Ruffcorn testified differently that he never advised petitioner to reject any plea bargain and has never done that with any clients ever.(note: after the denial, the petitioner found an unpublished case law involving Max Ruffcorn that showed Ruffcorn had advised a client to take an 8 year plea deal with a past client, directly contradicting his evidentiary hearing testimony. This fact was raised in the new petition to the Court of Appeal) During the evidentiary hearing, Max Ruffcorn testified contradictory and in some instances purposely lying under oath on numerous occasions. Judge Boeckman of the Shasta County Superior Court observed these instances of false testimony but did nothing and ruled that the attorney was credible and that the pro per petitioner was not credible. In essence, the judge denied the claim and petitioners life sentence was allowed to stand. Petitioner then reraised the claim in the California Court of Appeal on August 14, 2018. He attached a copy of the evidentiary hearing transcript to the writ petition showing the false testimony of his former attorney.

On November 19, 2018 the petition was summarily denied by Justice Coleman Blease. It is interesting to note that Justice Blease has been implicated in a corruption scandal in which he along with other judges routinely deny claims in the court of appeal covering up trial court judges and attorneys misconduct in the lower court. Here is another instance of corruption. (See Court of appeal, Third appellate district case #C087746) One may think the claim did not have merit, but if that was the case, the California Supreme Court would not have issued an order to show cause. Justice Blease is again attempting to cover up lower court misconduct.

  • Jul 6, 2017

Appellate case file audits indicate that the third district court of appeal in sacramento is corrupted by dishonest and unethical judges. For proof, documentation, and source material, please use the hyperlinks embedded throughout this Outscam.

3rd district justices vance w. Raye, cole blease, m. Kathleen butz, andrea lynn hoch, george nicholson, louis mauro, elena j. Duarte, ronald b. Robie, william j. Murray jr, harry e. Hull jr. And jonathan k. Renner all exhibit bias against self-represented appellants who can't afford an attorney, and bias against the socioeconomically disadvantaged, among other forms of misconduct.

Most of the 3rd district judges were promoted to the court of appeal from sacramento superior court, one of the most corrupt trial courts in california. When the third district hears appeals from sacramento superior court, instead of ruling on the merits of the appeal and holding judges and lawyers accountable for misconduct, the reviewing court will instead cover up or whitewash the routine judge and attorney misconduct that permeates the trial court.

Under the california judicial ethics code ยงยง 3d(1) and (2), the judges of the 3rd district are mandated reporters of judge and attorney misconduct. Third district case file audits document serious misconduct by judges and attorneys in appeals from sacramento superior court, yet the misconduct is ignored and often concealed by the justices on the appellate court.

Undisclosed conflicts of interest at the third district court of appeal in sacramento

3rd district court of appeal judges have personal, social and professional relationships with sacramento superior court judges and attorneys, many of whom are former co-workers. These relationships constitute conflicts of interest that, at a minimum, must be disclosed to appeal litigants. But the conflicts are not disclosed.

Sacramento superior court judge misconduct covered up by 3rd district court of appeal judges

These sacramento county judges have engaged in egregious misconduct - including criminal conduct - that has been ignored, concealed, whitewashed and covered up by their cronies on the 3rd district court of appeal in sacramento. Use the hyperlinks for more information.

Hon. Matthew gary, hon. Jaime roman, hon. Peter mcbrien, hon. Sharon lueras, hon. James mize, hon. Thadd blizzard, hon. Shellyanne chang, hon. Robert hight, hon. Kevin culhane, and hon. Laurie earl.

This is a partial list of judges. Click here for more.

Sacramento superior court attorney misconduct covered up by 3rd district court of appeal judges

These attorneys who practice law in sacramento superior court have engaged in egregious misconduct - including criminal conduct - that has been ignored, concealed, whitewashed and covered up by their cronies on the third district court. Use the hyperlinks for more information.

John richard sokol sbn 72739, elaine van beveren sbn 135745, paula dawn salinger sbn 221262, charlotte leigh keeley sbn 88904, russell william carlson sbn 181843, fredrick s. Cohen sbn 143407, camille heath hemmer sbn 113026, scott michael kendall sbn 166156, elizabeth noreen niemi sbn 226740, robert james o'hair sbn 77624, nancy perkovich sbn 88494, and jeffrey j. Posner sbn 69291.

This is a partial list of attorneys. Click here and here for more.

Bad faith dismissal of appeal by indigent, disabled litigant by justice coleman blease

An explicit example of bad faith, bias, abuse of authority, disregard for fundamental rights, intentional disregard of the law and retaliation by 3rd district judge cole blease.

California department of justice calls justice george nicholson "emotionally disturbed" and "marginally sane"

Third district judge george nicholson has a documented history of erratic employment conduct and mental health issues.

California 3rd district court of appeal - history of corruption, cronyism and conflicts of interest

Visit this page for detailed information, documentation, and source material about corruption in the california third district court of appeal in sacramento. For images and graphics for each justice on the 3rd district appellate court, use the links below:

Write a Review about Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District