Complainant QuinnCom Web Design (the “Complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by Author Anonymous . The Author contended that the Complainant did not pay him or his employees for work performed on a movie. The Complainant denies the allegations The Author also contended that the Complainant stole money from clients and then declared bankruptcy. The Complainant denies the assertions in the Report. The Author did not provide a response to this matter. Therefore, in accordance with the Outscam Rules (the “Rules), the Author waived their right to participate in this Arbitration. By submitting a Report and a Complaint on the Outscam websites, both the Complainant and the Author have agreed to submit the dispute to the outscam Program.
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
In this case, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included outscam Arbitration Statement, Complainant’s Witness Statements, and supporting documentation.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Boca Resto Lounge Reviews
Complainant QuinnCom Web Design (the “Complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by Author Anonymous . The Author contended that the Complainant did not pay him or his employees for work performed on a movie. The Complainant denies the allegations The Author also contended that the Complainant stole money from clients and then declared bankruptcy. The Complainant denies the assertions in the Report. The Author did not provide a response to this matter. Therefore, in accordance with the Outscam Rules (the “Rules), the Author waived their right to participate in this Arbitration. By submitting a Report and a Complaint on the Outscam websites, both the Complainant and the Author have agreed to submit the dispute to the outscam Program.
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
In this case, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included outscam Arbitration Statement, Complainant’s Witness Statements, and supporting documentation.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.